![]() |
without reimplementation |
![]() |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
The Bottom Line: Where’s the Money? Do you have a conflict of interest?
The first principle for properly addressing these ethical questions is to remember that your primary duty is to your client. The discipline of obtaining a requirements definition and performing a gap analysis among all the available alternatives is necessary to determine whether or not a product or service is optimal for a client project. Benchmarks or parameters should be defined in order to provide the framework for a systematic method of determining, describing, and disclosing a conflict. Parameters should include costs and benefits to each party involved in the transaction in the forms of capital, personnel costs, time requirements, risks, and any other relevant costs and benefits There are three major points of potential breach of ethical duty for a supplier of services or products: 1. Failure to disclose a conflict of interest. 2. Failure to accurately describe the extent of the conflict. 3. Deliberate or knowing use of bad or questionable judgment. There is the most risk of a conflict when the benefits to supplier and the difference in the comparative cost to the client are very high. In such a case, the supplier is most likely allowing his or her own interest to interfere with the best interests of the client. In a consulting situation, often the service provider is compensated with bonuses and commissions that are heavily weighted on billable hours and utilization, so a software product that effectively reduces the compensation to the consultant is spurned. In the case of a software supplier, the tendency is to claim functionality that is not a standard part of the packaged software just to make the sale or to ignore gaps that the software does not address. In those cases, the costs to the client escalate in relation to the work needed to fill the gaps not covered by the software that were not disclosed by the software supplier in promoting the sale. It is easy to see how each party could be financially motivated to sell its own product or service, even when careful assessment clearly indicates that such a product or service is not the optimal solution for the client.
Want to share this article? Download this article (PDF) |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Product | Results | About Us | Resources | Buy Now | Privacy | Contacts | Site Map |
||||||||||||